EU observers give an indication of how 2020 polls were manipulated – Secrets revealed


European Union observers in the just-ended presidential and parliamentary elections in Ghana have given pointers to how results were manipulated.

According to observers, results were not publicly displayed in 17 polling stations they observed.

European Union Election Observers (Photo by Jordi Perdigo/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

The observers however noted, “voting was conducted in a generally peaceful atmosphere and voting procedures were mostly followed, including the biometric verification of voters”.

“Furthermore, presiding officers appeared to have difficulties completing the result forms. The polling station result forms were not publicly displayed in 17 polling stations although party agents received a signed copy of the resulting form in all cases,” the EU observers said in their 12-page report on the election.

READ MORE  Police chase election violence suspects

The report also praised civil society organisations in the country.

“Ghanaian civil society has a strong presence and a leading role in electoral observation.

Domestic observation is organised, credible and well perceived by stakeholders.

The Coalition of Domestic Election Observers (CODEO), a network of 43 organizations advocating for democratic institutional development and human rights, leads the national observation activities.

“CODEO, with support from the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD Ghana), among others, deployed around 4,000 observers on election day. CODEO issued reports on registration, campaigning, and incidents, and set up a parallel vote tabulation (PVT) exercise. The Institute for Democratic Governance (IDEG) deployed some 700 observers”.

READ MORE  Shai Osudoku: Odumse Gets A Health Facility From Qatar Charity Foundation

It also raised concerns over the collation process in the polls.

“Collation of results at the constituency level was observed in 35 constituency collation centers with many of them being visited repeatedly. The collation process was less well organized and less transparent often due to a lack of detailed procedures, inadequate facilities, and overcrowding which at times led to agents and observers not having a clear view of the procedures and the filling in of result forms.

“Instances of unrest and tension were observed in Asawase, Sunyani West, and Techiman South constituencies. The results were collated in the presence of party agents and observers and key transparency measures were adhered to”.

Facebook Comments Box


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here